Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Norms of publication

As Draft Two of my novel continues percolating with my beta readers, I've been thinking about publication. Not because I have any concrete plans (perhaps my ontology only allows for plans to be abstract) in that direction myself, at the moment, but because I hang out in an FB group for NaNoWriMo participants and many of THEM are interested in publication and write about their pursuit of it. And there's a number of ways in which the whole "publication of a novel" business is so different from the whole "publication fo a journal article" business.

Join me for a moment in putting on Idealist Glasses, and take a look at the academic publication process -- for journal articles, book manuscripts, conference proceedings, etc. Seen through those glasses, the (or maybe an) ultimate goal of publication is to Promote Truth. How do we decide what gets published, in academia? At one point, we decided that Truth was what mattered. So many artefacts of the academic publication process can be traced to an attempt to realize this goal: Anonymity. Peer review. Retractions. How do we determine whether something is true? We get other experts to read it and give their opinion on it. (In some fields, they may also give their opinions on other things, such as novelty, importance, linguistic beauty, and many, less relevant, aspects.) How do we ensure that it is Truth we are promoting, and not some lesser virtue such as Nepotism? We make the reviewing system anonymous, not only for the people doing the reviewing but also (though not always) the authors. If sufficient doubt is cast on The Truth of an academic publication, there are means in place to issue corrections or even to retract the piece altogether (though that doesn't seem to prevent some people from still acting as if the retraction never happened.)

All of these seems sensible provisions to put in place when seeking The Truth. But when that is not the ultimate goal, some of these provisions seem downright weird. Can you imagine someone retracting a novel? We can all imagine someone prohibiting or banning a novel (and there fiction does not differ from nonfiction, for Aristotle's works were routinely banned and their study prohiited), and we can also imagine someone issuing a new and improved edition, one which takes into account certain infelicities which arose when the narrator did not want his traveling companions to know just exactly he had found that magical ring -- but on what sort of basis would someone retract their novel? "I'm sorry, I made a mistake, what I said was wrong." One of the deliciously freeing parts about writing fiction is that it is difficult to actually write anything wrong. You can write something badly, or you can write something self-contradictory, or you can write something offensive, but (and this is basically the problem of fictional entities and fictional discourse in a nutshell) in what sense can a novel be described as wrong, in the way that academic publications can be wrong in failing to adhere to The Truth? It's certainly not clear to me. Maybe I just haven't thought about it enough.

One might think that anonymity would still be a good thing, because it is there not because it promotes Truth directly but because it helps demote other things, such as Nepotism or Cronyism. One might think that even if promoting Truth is not the aim of the publication process in fiction, reducing cronyism might be. Which is why I find it so weird, coming from a well-entrenched position in the academic side of things, the requirements of certain publishers. For example, the "Rules for Submitting" for one Australian publisher include:

In the body of your email, tell us about yourself:

  • 100 words about you
  • Where in cyberspace we can find you (links are good)
  • What you've done, including any previously published or self-published works
  • Whether you're part of any writers groups
  • Whether you have any media contacts/a blogger profile

If you're an academic, I'd like you to pause for a moment and reflect on what you'd feel like being asked to provide this information before sending off your next journal article or book manuscript. If you're like me, you're probably thinking "why the hell should any of that matter??"

It's because the aim of fiction publication is not The Truth but The Readers. The point of publication is to be read -- either as an end in itself, or as a means to money. One may complain about the failings of academic peer review and publication processes in the early 21st century, but I have to admit, I am really really glad that whether my work gets published does not depend solely on whether the publisher thinks its worth their financial while to publish it. [Note: I am going to completely avoid the issue of predatory academic publishers whether they be genuine scams which take payment and provide no guarantee of quality of publication or whether they be things like Springer and Elsevier, whose bottom line is money. They are not -- yet -- the ones making the individual decision on my individual publications.] Of course, for many academic presses, financial matters do matter, and not every book that says true things is going to be published. But there is still much more space out there for academics books which say true things but will not generate much money than there are for non-revenue-generating fiction.

Which brings up another norm where the two fields differ significantly, and that's the legitimate possibility of self-publication in the fiction side of things. Sure, there is a lot of self-published dross out there, but there are also some really good things, and increasingly (but not universally), saying a book is self-published is not taken as a slur. While blogs, et al., are all plausibly construed as "self-publishing" venues in academia, I think very few people would, upon having their academic book turned down by press after press after press, decide that the thing to do was to self-publish. And I would be surprised if such a book would carry much weight when it came to the author's annual review, or tenure/promotion. (Maybe I'm wrong. If anyone has any good examples of recent -- last 10-15 years -- self-published academic books which are treated as legitimate in their fields, please comment, I'd love to know.) The academic alternative to self-publication is perhaps the setting up of academic small presses (College Publications, I'm looking at you), but these are still rare, and few people have the wherewithal (including the clout!) to establish a new one.

There are plenty of other differing norms. Simultaneous submissions are often acceptable unless otherwise stated in the fiction side of things, whereas they are seriously and significantly frowned upon in academic publishing. In academic publication, we generally have the luxury of submitting without having to pay for the right to have our submission be read by the referee/editor -- not so for many fiction venues, particularly journals. But there is one norm that I look at from my comfortable academic seat and wonder -- wouldn't that be nice? or at least how would it work in academic context? -- and that is the literary agent. You convince an agent your work is worth representing, and they promote you and support you. They are your go-between with the publisher. And they only get paid if you get paid (Oh. There it is. That's why it wouldn't work. When was the last time you got paid for a piece of academic writing?). I find the idea of having one's own personal cheerleader, essentially, someone who believes enough in you to be your champion, a really attractive idea. Too often academic publishing is a horrible and horribly isolating process. Wouldn't it be nice to have someone whose job was to be on your side -- but since you aren't paying them to be on your side, you know that they're on your side because they think you can do it? (Sort of like Your Personal Penguin for academics.)

But, I'm really not sure at all how one could adapt the idea of a literary agent to the academic realm. Until then, I guess I'll just have to keep Believing in Myself.

1 comment:

  1. HOW I GOT THIS POWERFUL MAGIC RINGS AND NECKLACES FOR RICHES, FAME, CONNECTION, LONG LIFE,MIRACLES,SIGNS,WONDERS, HEALING OF DISEASES ETC.
    This is my piece of encountered in the spiritual realm with doctor Aiwaise powerful magic rings and necklaces that works.
    I know you might also come across this one day my spiritualist and please when that happened please do forgive me for I don't know if you are allowed to be identified or shared on the internet.My doctor this is mathias.The man that came to your temple with his wife last weekend Sir for what you did for me and my wife.Thanking you is not enough that's why I decided to share it online.Doctor people are suffering,scammed and dying of poverty everyday for lack of knowing the right and spiritual way to acquire wealth. And you have this power to make them rich even with what one will called ordinary ring.

    Dear brothers and sisters of the world, like I said earlier my name still remain mathias the car dealer.doctor Aiwaise permit me to share this, I am an engineer and also sell cars in Cameroon, Ghana, Togo and Nigeria. The business was moving well that I have to buy a house for my last daughter in Lagos island and also help many to solved financial issues.But on this faithful day all were gone at a speck of an eye.Come 12th may 2017, was my doom day when I lost goods worth billions of dollars in the ocean.All the car that was supposed to be delivered in one month time all perished in that ocean all I can remember then was that someone called and informed me of the loss.I was heart attacked and got hospitalised for weeks.later on I was getting myself due to family and friends advises and supports.I was also a man of faith and courage I composed myself though it was not easy.On this deed day my wife came to me with her gadget showing me some stuffs on the Internet I saw many such as joining one occultist group to get money but in all, what caught my attention most is that of a testimony my customer (Lady Clara Jonathan)shared that was about one doctor Aiwaise which I have been hearing of. No wounder this woman was smelling and swimming in billions.When I first saw his post (doctor aiwaise) I despised it and I thought he was one of those fraudulent act online.later same day I called lady Clara and invited him to my house told her about my present predicament and also the post I saw online which was done by her due to her information.she narrated all she had with doctor and gave me his online contact by this time doctor was on assessment in China. I ordered for the magic ring to regain my wealth, fame, connection, Good life etc .And also magic necklaces for my wife and daughter for good luck and long like. Immediately, he responded and gave me procedures which I quickly followed. Three days later my ring was sure to reach me.Behold it was.I used as directed.To summerised it all, now I am two times richer than I used to. what is the secret? just what people see as a common ring.my friends out there going through this, it is real this is not a scam if there be, it is not from this email;( doctoraiwaise@gmail.com.) Any other email aside this, you should beware of it.it is not from my doctor. and notice to all Scammers I love you all you can decide to do all sort of fraud but when you try to use this post or email as your tool, I tell you it will be your end in this world I know what this man has done to many.so beware!!!.
    To reach this highly spiritual man and request for your ring of success contact this same email at doctoraiwaise@gmail.com. and you can also call or whatsaap him on this line +2349068355820.This is the same process I undergone and those that I have referred too.
    Thanks to you doctor Aiwaise for giving me the prevailage to help enlightened those out there that might not be aware of this your greatness. More power to your elbow sir.
    with regards,
    your ever humble customer.

    ReplyDelete